Asses the fundamental principles of Jurisprudence in Lumets film Essay

Asses the fundamental principles of Jurisprudence in Lumets film Twelve Angry Men - Essay ExampleThat is until unrivall(a)ed jurywoman votes not guilty on the grounds that its possible that the man is innocent. That one phrase is the key to his argument, which enables him to change the opinions of every other juror in the room and turn a near conviction into an acquittal. The juror, Juror 8, argues that it is not certain that the witnesses were correct in their testimonies. When one of the other jurors argues against him and says that what they are doing isnt an exact science he replies, Thats right, it isnt. This juror recognizes the fundamental principles of jurisprudence as it applies to juries in a court of law. He knows that jury computation should be approached from a careful perspective and should not stray from that perspective.Juror 8 recognizes that there is an ethical ground by which every member of a jury should adhere to. The jury has the right to con both the law and the facts.- Samuel Chase (fortunecity.com). This means that the jury is granted the right to weigh the facts of the case and count to a conclusion about what illegal activities have occurred based on those facts, but only those facts. They dont only have the right to determine the facts. They have the obligation to determine the facts. There git be no straying from the facts.Biases or prejudices cannot interfere with a jurors decision. The jurors also cannot make sense to a conclusion that is based only on speculation or a leap of faith. Most of em, its like they have no feelings They can do anything Whats goin on here? Im trying to tell you were makin a big mistake, you people This kids a liar I know it. I know all about them I mean, whats happenin here? Im speaking my piece, says Juror 10. The last part of that line speaks volumes about why that particular juror thinks that he knows precisely what happened the night of the murder. He has let his opinion